Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda

[Nicolas P. Rougier (inria)]

Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:

> It seems you are using ts.el, which isn't on ELPA, and 
> additionally depends
> on s.el that also (famously) isn't on ELPA.
>
> That being said, ts seems to only have a weak dependency on s 
> (two
> usages of s-join), so maybe ts could be added to ELPA -- in one 
> form or
> another -- as it seems to have a few useful improvements over 
> the
> default time and duration functions.

Thanks for the review, I didn't pay attention to this point 
actually. I confirm than ts would be a very nice addition to ELPA 
since it really simplifies time management for user and comes with 
a very clean API. I guess only Adam Porter can answer if he want 
to add it to ELPA or not. Should I try to remove the dependency in 
the meantime?

Nicolas