[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b'
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b' |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:41:06 -0700 |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> Is the "prefix command" thing vital to know? And should the ??'s be
> fixed?
I don't think the "prefix command" is vital to know, as the commands
will be listed individually later. I say skip it.
It would be good to fix "??", yes.
> key binding
> --- -------
> DEL backward-delete-char-untabify
> C-H-x closure
> H-v eval-current-buffer
>
> C-c d closure
> C-c s lars-patch-strip
>
> C-M-i completion-at-point
> C-M-q indent-pp-sexp
> C-M-x eval-defun
Much better. Perhaps put "closure" as "(closure)" or "[closure]" or
something to make it clear that this is not a command named "closure"?
Or perhaps "<closure>"?
> Or... make that
>
> --- -------
>
> into a thin line on graphical displays? Makes the display even more
> compact.
Is the line necessary at all? I think one line of spacing is okay
instead.
We could experiment with either bold or a different color for "key" and
"binding" and different combination of blank space/no blank space and
line/no line.
(Can we please capitalize "Key" and "Binding" while we're at it?)
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', (continued)
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Kévin Le Gouguec, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b',
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Po Lu, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/31
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/31
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Gregory Heytings, 2021/10/31