[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ligature support
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Ligature support |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Nov 2021 19:02:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> That font was one of the fonts Yuri listed as having fi ligatures. And
>> indeed:
>>
>> <LigatureSubst index="0">
>> <LigatureSet glyph="f">
>> <Ligature components="l" glyph="fl"/>
>> <Ligature components="i" glyph="fi"/>
>> </LigatureSet>
>> </LigatureSubst>
>>
>> But HarfBuzz is still choosing not to use a ligature here, apparently,
>> for reasons that escape me.
>
> Before or after the setting of composition-function-table that I
> posted? If before, it's expected.
Those screenshots were from hb-view, not Emacs, so they should be
totally authoritative in how HarfBuzz is meant to display that run of
characters.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Ligature support, (continued)
- Re: Ligature support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Yuri Khan, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/06
- Re: Ligature support,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Ligature support, Yuri Khan, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Yuri Khan, 2021/11/06
- Re: Ligature support, tomas, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, tomas, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, tomas, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/05
- Re: Ligature support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/05