[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2021 22:39:32 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > The bigger question is why ctl-x-8-map goes through
> > key-translation-map rather than behaving like C-x 4 and friends?
The motive may be so that it will work inside incremental search.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix, T.V Raman, 2021/11/08
- Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix, Andreas Schwab, 2021/11/08
- Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix, T.V Raman, 2021/11/08
- Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix, T.V Raman, 2021/11/08
- Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix, Robert Pluim, 2021/11/08
- Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix, Andreas Schwab, 2021/11/08
- Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/08
- Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix, T.V Raman, 2021/11/09
- Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/09
- Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix, T.V Raman, 2021/11/09
- Re: Binding C-x 8 commands to another prefix,
Richard Stallman <=