Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:58:52 +0000
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> 
> You asked me for some benchmark figures comparing master with the
> scratch/correct-warning-pos branch.  I supplied them, and they suggest
> that the performance penalty in the new branch is small, around 1%.

1% slowdown is insignificant.  But Andrea suggested to use an
additional suite of benchmarks, and I thought you were going to do
that as well.

> I would like to merge this branch, when it becomes stable, into master,
> thus finally resolving the bug of the wrong positions in warning
> messages from the byte compiler.

If all the benchmarks show a slowdown <= 1%, I'm okay with merging it.

Thanks.