emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Oddities in ./configure --with-pgtk's output


From: Po Lu
Subject: Re: Oddities in ./configure --with-pgtk's output
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 18:28:30 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.60 (gnu/linux)

Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com> writes:

> I diff'ed the output of "./configure" and "./configure --with-pgtk" out
> of curiosity; there are a couple of things that I found intriguing.
> Some of them might warrant a bug report; since I could very well be
> missing something, I thought I'd report here first.

>> -checking for libwebp >= 0.6.0... yes

> IIUC 'configure' guards WebP support behind several 'test "${HAVE_XXX}"'
> clauses where XXX represents "something that supports displaying
> images".  Should this be extended to ${HAVE_PGTK}?

Could you try to extend it that way and test if the webp support works?
If it does, I will enable it for the PGTK build.

>> +checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
>> +checking pkg-config is at least version 0.16... yes

> Not sure why this check is only present --with-pgtk?

I don't know either, but I'm not worried.

>> @@ -619,9 +592,9 @@
>>    Does Emacs use -lxml2?                                  yes
>>    Does Emacs use -lfreetype?                              yes
>>    Does Emacs use HarfBuzz?                                yes
>> -  Does Emacs use -lm17n-flt?                              yes
>> +  Does Emacs use -lm17n-flt?                              
>>    Does Emacs use -lotf?                                   yes
>> -  Does Emacs use -lxft?                                   no
>> +  Does Emacs use -lxft?                                   
>>    Does Emacs use -lsystemd?                               yes
>>    Does Emacs use -ljansson?                               yes
>>    Does Emacs use the GMP library?                         yes

> Should -lm17n-flt and -lxft say "no" instead of being empty?

I think so, I'll fix that in a while.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]