emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Native compilation on Windows, was Re: Bootstrap Compilation Speed


From: Corwin Brust
Subject: Re: Native compilation on Windows, was Re: Bootstrap Compilation Speed
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 03:05:55 -0600

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:56 PM H. Dieter Wilhelm
<dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> wrote:
> Corwin Brust <corwin@bru.st> writes:
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 1:12 AM H. Dieter Wilhelm
> > <dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> wrote:
> >> Corwin Brust <corwin@bru.st> writes:

> I'm sorry to say but the problem with the missing libgmp-10.dll remains
> also in your installer.

I found myself up triaging some things for another project I support,
so kicked off a new build.  These include pushes to the emacs-28
branch though today up to approximately 10pm US/Central.  I think
these new versions may do the trick.   A patch-set is attached for
changes to the admin/nt/build-*zips* scripts.  You will see that I'm
still building without -static; I haven't had a chance to dig into
that yet.

  
https://git.sr.ht/~mplscorwin/emacs-w64/tree/master/item/with-native-compilation

Would you be able to try again with this version of emacs-28.0.91-installer.exe?
In fact, all of the packages in the linked folder should work now AFAIK.

> >> Please tell me if the uninstaller can remove all remnants of an Emacs
> >> installation, or do I have to clean some parts of the registry or
> >> whatever?
> >
> > If we find it isn't removing something it creates I think we should
> > open bug-reports for that specifically.
>
> Some minor observiations:
>
> 1. The uninstaller isn't removing a link to runemacs.exe.

I think this should get a bug report (assuming it's still happening
with the above-linked versions).

> 2. The installer has the Gnu(s)-Emacs image aspect ratio rather
>    distorted.

This feels like a lower priority but maybe it too should be tracked
with a separate bug report?

> 3. The installer default is "c:\Program Files\Emacs" I think it would be
>    cleaner when the installation tree includes the version number.

I see you are already discussing this one with Eli; I'll leave it to
the two of you as Eli's thoughts appear to echo my own here.

Attachment: emacs-28_nt-dist-build-scripts.patch
Description: Binary data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]