Re: Optional Eshell modules -- to emacs.git or ELPA?

[Philip Kaludercic]

Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes:

> Hello,
>
> I have a useful Eshell thing that I would like to make more broadly
> available but which should definitely not be turned on by default.  The
> final implementation will be as an Eshell module which makes an addition
> to post-self-insert-hook.

Could you give any details on what the feature is? 

> I notice that there aren't any Eshell modules in GNU ELPA.  So, should I
> propose this for inclusion in lisp/eshell/em-*.el, or as something new
> in GNU ELPA?
>
> One advantage of the former option is that the extension could be
> documented in the Eshell manual, whereas otherwise all there can be is
> docstrings and the package description, which is markedly less
> discoverable.

Without any further information, I would appreciate it if more features
would be added directly to eshell, but adding it to ELPA first so that
it can "ripen" isn't a bad approach either.

> Thanks!

-- 
        Philip Kaludercic