Re: [PATCH] Re: Other details about completion.

[Juri Linkov]

>>>> 2) The M-<up>/M-<down> is not intuitive when completions are not in
>>>> one-column format, and the M-<left>/M-<right> cannot be used because
>>>> they are already taken..
>>>
>>> I agree with that -- I expected M-<down> to work on the visually
>>> displayed completions, not the logical order.
>>
>> Unfortunately, M-<left>/M-<right> can't be used for visual navigation
>> from the minibuffer.
>
> Yes, that's a problem.  And we can't rebind M-<left>/<right> there in
> general, because it'd be disruptive.
>
> Rebinding them after M-<down> might be an option?  But...  Probably not.

Why not, set-transient-map could activate M-<left>/<right> after M-<down>.