[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions
From: |
Yuri Khan |
Subject: |
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Apr 2022 23:51:29 +0700 |
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 18:54, Phil Sainty <psainty@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
> I believe there's something called "X-Wayland" for running X programs
> under Wayland, in case that's the missing piece of the puzzle?
>
> IIUC you can use that to run the same (single) X build of emacs when
> you're using Wayland that you use when you're not, which avoids the
> problem you've described.
If you have a HiDPI monitor, an X application on an X server gets full
resolution, a Wayland application on a Wayland compositor gets full
resolution, but an X application via Xwayland on a Wayland compositor
gets rendered at low resolution and then upscaled. It’s a non-starter.
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, (continued)
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Dirk-Jan C. Binnema, 2022/04/19
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions,
Yuri Khan <=
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Pankaj Jangid, 2022/04/22
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/19
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/04/19
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/19
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/04/19
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/20
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/04/20