[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone |
Date: |
Fri, 06 May 2022 18:41:29 +0200 |
>>>>> On Fri, 06 May 2022 21:20:25 +0800, Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> said:
Po> Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
>>> + if (ConnectionNumber (dpy) >= FD_SETSIZE)
>>> + dpy = 0;
Po> Speaking of which, DPY could be NULL here, so this should be:
Po> if (dpy && ConnectionNumber (dpy) >= FD_SETSIZE)
Po> dpy = 0;
Thanks, Iʼll stick that somewhere on the branch.
Robert
--
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, (continued)
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Robert Pluim, 2022/05/05
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Robert Pluim, 2022/05/06
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Po Lu, 2022/05/06
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Robert Pluim, 2022/05/06
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Po Lu, 2022/05/06
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Robert Pluim, 2022/05/06
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Po Lu, 2022/05/06
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Robert Pluim, 2022/05/06
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Po Lu, 2022/05/06
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Po Lu, 2022/05/06
- Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone,
Robert Pluim <=
Surprisingly high use of file descriptors, Stefan Monnier, 2022/05/04
Re: 1024 file descriptors should be enough for anyone, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/05/05