Re: master e8488bcc9c: Avoid having font locking triggering unnecessary auto-saving

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> Maybe we could make `buffer-modified-p` return `autosaved` rather than
> `t` when the buffer is modified but auto-saved, and then
> have `restore-buffer-modified-p` accept such a value accordingly, yes.

Unfortunately `buffer-modified-p' is documented to return t...  Changing
that feels a bit "eh".  (Which is why we should always say non-nil.)

I don't think adding an extra call to `recent-auto-save-p' to the macro
would be that bad, but if people think altering the return value of
`buffer-modified-p' is OK, we can do that.  Eli, what do you think?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no