Re: master ed84f24a21: Make `signal-process' allow completing over signal names

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Daniel Martín <mardani29@yahoo.es> writes:

> In the same header that defines SIG2STR_MAX there is SIGNUM_BOUND.  It
> is defined depending on the availability of other macros, including
> NSIG.  Couldn't it be used instead?

If I understand correctly, SIG2STR_MAX is also defined by the OS
sig2str:

/* Don't override system declarations of SIG2STR_MAX, sig2str, str2sig.  */
#ifndef SIG2STR_MAX

So we're free to use SIG2STR_MAX on all systems (because it's either
defined by gnulib or the OS).  Is the same the case for SIGNUM_BOUND?
(It might just be defined by gnulib.)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no