|Subject:||Re: Special Event: Davin reveals his own personal additions to Emacs.|
|Date:||Thu, 14 Jul 2022 16:42:44 +1200|
Is dmp a reasonable prefix for global variables?I once used my-* for my global variables but abandoned itwhen other people started to use my code.It is rather unlikely that there is a dmp out there in the world today.Lisp namespaces should be allocated on a first in first served basis,which is how internet domain names are allocated.On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 13:48, Stefan Monnier <email@example.com> wrote:> I use debugging checkpoints every second line
> so the following code cannot be written:
> (defun foo ()
> (message "&apple:1")
> (message "&apple:2")
> (message "&apple:3")
> (message "&apple:4"))))
I do use separate lines for closing parens every once in a while, don't
get me wrong. It's just an exception rather than a rule.
[ Note also that inserting/removing such `message` needs to be different
for the last element in any case because it determines the return
>> - should use `with-current-buffer`.
> is that instead of (set-buffer buf)?
If you compile the code, the byte-compiler will give you a warning
suggesting to replace with-current-buffer for save-excursion + set-buffer.
>> - should not `setq` on a global variable that doesn't have an appropriate
>> namespace prefix.
> Do you mean the following is not allowed:
> (setq apple 'banana)
> but the following code is allowed:
> (setq dmp-apple 'banana)
Neither are recommended without first declaring that global variable
(since that's what it is: a global variable).
And global declarations need to use a proper namespace prefix.
Otherwise you're at risk of stepping on someone else's toes/variables.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|