Re: master f117b5df4d: Add new functions eol and bol

[Po Lu]

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:

> How about `point-bol' (while making `point-at-bol' obsolete to avoid
> confusion)?

That isn't a very good name.  point-bol screams "point what?", where
"what" could either be "at", "after", or "before".

How about "pos-at-bol" or "bol-from-point" (which would also accept an
optional arg POINT, telling the function where to search from?)