Re: wrap-search 3.3.5

[Philip Kaludercic]

Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> writes:

>
> Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>
>> Could you elaborate what you meant to say with this message.
>> Should it be added to ELPA?
>
> Sure!

Do you have a git repository?

>> Btw. the commentary section should start after the
>> header section.
>
> Okay, note that `checkdoc' don't say that, nor does the
> byte-compiler ...

>From what I believe, it would only matter if the header is parsed, which
is not what checkdoc ensures, let alone the byte-compiler.  The only
thing that I see it breaks is that `lm-commentary' returns the headers,
which would look bad in describe-package.

> But thanks, you mean like this?

Yes.