[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The FIXME in `dotimes'
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: The FIXME in `dotimes' |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Sep 2022 13:37:33 +0000 |
Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org> writes:
> 7 sep. 2022 kl. 12.22 skrev Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>:
>
>> I've always been wondering about this comment in the `dotimes' macro:
>>
>> ;; FIXME: This cost disappears in byte-compiled lexical-binding files.
>
> Wonder no more, it's gone! Thanks for the tip.
On a related note, I have been wondering if it would make sense to
extend `dotimes' to be usable without a variable, if it isn't required.
So that either
(dotimes (count) ...)
or
(dotimes count ...)
do the same as
(dotimes (_ count) ...)
?
- The FIXME in `dotimes', Philip Kaludercic, 2022/09/07
- Re: The FIXME in `dotimes', Mattias Engdegård, 2022/09/07
- Re: The FIXME in `dotimes', Philip Kaludercic, 2022/09/07
- Re: The FIXME in `dotimes',
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: The FIXME in `dotimes', Mattias Engdegård, 2022/09/07
- Re: The FIXME in `dotimes', Philip Kaludercic, 2022/09/07
- Re: The FIXME in `dotimes', Robert Pluim, 2022/09/07
- RE: [External] : Re: The FIXME in `dotimes', Drew Adams, 2022/09/07
- Re: [External] : Re: The FIXME in `dotimes', Philip Kaludercic, 2022/09/07