[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Progress on merging Eglot?
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Progress on merging Eglot? |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:14:33 +0000 |
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> In either case, the main problem is that the (908) commits in the
>> repository don't appear to be in the conventional changelog format,
>> and I don't think there is an easy way to automatically fix that.
>
> Can you point to examples? And why do you say it's a "main problem"?
I should have been more concrete, a lot of messages appear to reference
issues in the elgot issue tracker, that wouldn't make much sense in
emacs.git.
> Anyway I use and enforce the same format in both my Eglot and emacs.git
> commits, and I've never had big complaints about the format of the
> latter (that I remember).
>
> If you're concerned about the ChangeLog style
>
> * eglot.el (foo): bar.
>
> Not making sense once eglot.el is in lisp/progmodes/eglot.el, then I
> don't think it's a problem.
>
> Also, rewriting all commits once is fine with me, as long as the long
> string of commits is preserved.
>
> João
- Progress on merging Eglot?, Payas Relekar, 2022/09/08
- Re: Progress on merging Eglot?, João Távora, 2022/09/08
- Re: Progress on merging Eglot?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/09/08
- Re: Progress on merging Eglot?, João Távora, 2022/09/08
- Re: Progress on merging Eglot?,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: Progress on merging Eglot?, João Távora, 2022/09/08
- Re: Progress on merging Eglot?, Payas Relekar, 2022/09/08
- Re: Progress on merging Eglot?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/09/08
- Re: Progress on merging Eglot?, João Távora, 2022/09/08
- Re: Progress on merging Eglot?, Payas Relekar, 2022/09/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Progress on merging Eglot?, João Távora, 2022/09/08