|
From: | Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: | Re: Implementing image support for kitty terminal |
Date: | Fri, 9 Sep 2022 16:10:07 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 |
> Nagle's algorithm and TCP_NODELAY are the keywords here, AFAIK.Yup, SSH must be using TCP_NODELAY interactively. I can't see how else that would work. And OpenSSH docs say it uses TCP_NODELAY for X forwarding, so that makes sense.
Which means that our "intelligent" update on terminals, which does potentially many writes may produce as many packets. Which may be a problem sometimes :-).
It wouldn't be hard to buffer the writes until the update is done, I think. But is it worth it as an option? Don't know.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |