[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: noverlay branch
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: noverlay branch |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Oct 2022 07:30:33 +0300 |
> From: Matt Armstrong <matt@rfc20.org>
> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:25:45 -0700
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> We also have tests for marker scaling. If the overlay tree
> >> implementation can be reused for markers, it would also be great.
> >
> > Not in Emacs 29, I'm afraid.
>
> Scalable markers will be *much* easier conceptually than overlays. I
> had this in mind for a post noverlay work.
I didn't say they were complicated.
- Re: noverlay branch, (continued)
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/10
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/10
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/10
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/11
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/12
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/12
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/16
Re: noverlay branch, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/10/07
Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/08
Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/08
Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/23