[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter
From: |
Payas Relekar |
Subject: |
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Oct 2022 15:19:19 +0530 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.8.10; emacs 29.0.50 |
Ketevan Lomidze <catevan@skiff.com> writes:
> Are you guys aware that tree-sitter is developed by one person who is now in a
> company to develop their own commercial text editor? Is it wise to depend on
> such external projects and to neglect your own major modes?
Isn't that guaranteed to keep the person employed and tree-sitter
development ongoing since their new product depends on it?
Besides, tree-sitter the technology has been *very* widely adopted.
Besides NeoVim integration, it is already used by Github for code
highlight and quite a few LSP servers also wrap it for parsing the file
for font lock etc.
It has become very much de-facto standard in its own niche and with such
a level of adoption, I would not worry about it being abandoned.
--
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, (continued)
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/14
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/14
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/14
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/14
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/15
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/13
RE: Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Ketevan Lomidze, 2022/10/15
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Ketevan Lomidze, 2022/10/15
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter,
Payas Relekar <=