Re: eglot.el defcustomʼs

[Robert Pluim]

>>>>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:26:01 +0100, João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> 
>>>>> said:

    >> all the defcustomʼs in eglot.el lack a :version tag. Is that
    >> intentional?


    João> No really, probably oversight and the fact that Eglot being a
    João> GNU ELPA package (presumably easy to upgrade) doesn't usually mean
    João> such version tags are so important.

Theyʼre not important until we start changing defaults, and then they
offer an easy way for people to identify from when they can start
shouting at us :-)

    João> That and the fact that Eglot doesn't really have that many defcustoms.

    João> So, if you want to add :version tags, go ahead.  Note that Eglot
    João> does GNU ELPA double-duty as a :core package, so not sure what
    João> you should put there, but others are perhaps better informed than
    João> me.

Iʼm not sure what the interaction is between :version in defcustomʼs
and eglot being a :core package, which is why I asked. Maybe Stefan
can enlighten us?

Robert
--