|
From: | Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: | Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages |
Date: | Tue, 8 Nov 2022 07:19:47 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 |
It adds a feature that nothing in Emacs actually uses. It is potentially significant, but it won't affect anything if you don't use it. I think you have exaggerated a .01 into .99.
I don't agree. Symbols are at the heart of Lisp. Changing their semantics is a big deal, and as soon as that features is in, it will be used. BTW, in light of what I read now on emacs-devel in various threads, I take my questions about the design of shorthands and there use instead of modules/packages back, because there is no design. This belongs into a feature branch, IMO.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |