[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eglot and tramp
From: |
Brian Cully |
Subject: |
Re: eglot and tramp |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:24:41 -0500 |
Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de> writes:
> Locally, I have tested it with the methods "docker" and "kubernetes", it
> seems to work. I couldn't test with "podman", because I haven't such a
> system just now.
I've applied your patch, and will get back to you after I've used it for
a few days. So far, so good, though. Is there any behavior I should be
paying special attention to?
> For "nspawn" I cannot say anything, I don't use it. Perhaps it is
> sufficient to add a similar line in its tramp-methods specification,
> don't know. You as author might know it better. And if it works
> sufficiently, we might also think about integrating it into
> tramp-container.el. But this would be another story.
If nspawn-style containers are desirable in mainline Tramp, I can put
together a patch for you when I get some cycles.
-bjc
- eglot and tramp, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2022/11/14
- Re: eglot and tramp, Brian Cully, 2022/11/14
- Re: eglot and tramp, Michael Albinus, 2022/11/15
- Re: eglot and tramp, Brian Cully, 2022/11/15
- Re: eglot and tramp, Michael Albinus, 2022/11/15
- Re: eglot and tramp, Brian Cully, 2022/11/16
- Re: eglot and tramp, Michael Albinus, 2022/11/16
- Re: eglot and tramp, Michael Albinus, 2022/11/18
- Re: eglot and tramp,
Brian Cully <=
- Re: eglot and tramp, Michael Albinus, 2022/11/20
- Re: eglot and tramp, Brian Cully, 2022/11/21
- Re: eglot and tramp, Michael Albinus, 2022/11/21