[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter a

From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance)
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:34:22 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2

On 19.11.2022 12:46, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
My question is, do these user-level applications have to be distributed
along with Emacs, or could they be made to be "explicitly" opt-in by
installing them from ELPA.  In-core appears to usually bring a
commitment to maintain a library, and deprecating can take years.  If
Emacs 29 lays the technical foundations, the low-level API for
treesitter to work, we can have packages on ELPA experiment with the
higher-level abstractions.  Whatever is the most successful approach,
can be added to Emacs later on.

Wasn't https://github.com/emacs-tree-sitter/elisp-tree-sitter that way for us to experiment with approaches before bring TS to the core?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]