[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users
From: |
xenodasein |
Subject: |
Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 10:01:08 +0100 (CET) |
Nov 30, 2022, 06:23 by psionik@positron.solutions:
> > (local-set-key ?\M-n #'magit-section-next)
>
> This is a good edge case solution. It is not a good solution for moving or
> removing bindings coherently across all current and future modes.
>
> ...
>
Eli does have some rigid expectation as to how things should be, and
instead of making these explicit would rather toy with askers over
piece by piece mails like this. I suggest to save time stop poking
around how things are done in defaults and write something brand-new
like transient.el then similarly send it for inclusion in Emacs.
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users, (continued)
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/28
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/28
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users, Psionic K, 2022/11/28
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/28
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users, Psionic K, 2022/11/29
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/29
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users, Psionic K, 2022/11/30
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users,
xenodasein <=
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/30
- Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users, John Yates, 2022/11/29