[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tree-sitter version?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: tree-sitter version? |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Dec 2022 18:13:06 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > I suggest that we rename that mode to typescript-mode,
> > for the sake of clarity and discoverability.
> > That will help the people who'd want to use it
> > notice its existence.
> It was renamed to typescript-ts-mode.
That eliminates the problem.
It seems that we have a series of many pairs of major mode,
FOO-mode and FOO-ts-mode, where FOO-ts-mode uses treesitter
and FOO-mode does not use it. Is that correct?
It is no disaster, but is this really the interface we want to use for
enabling or disabling treesitter? I am sure we can make it cleaner.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: tree-sitter version?,
Richard Stallman <=