[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29 |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2022 22:11:22 +0000 |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>> - It appears that use-package is sometimes formatted using @code and
>> sometimes not. I can't make out a consistent rule.
>
> I've tried to follow this:
>
> - Format use-package with no markup when referring to the package.
> - Use @code{use-package} when referring to a macro call.
>
> Does that make sense?
That does make sense, but I believe to have had found instances where
this was not the case. I'll try and see if I can locate those again.
Also, this ties into the other point about the usage of @file.
Shouldn't the first case be wrapped in @file?
- Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, (continued)
- Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/09
- Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/09
- Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Stefan Kangas, 2022/12/10
- Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Stefan Kangas, 2022/12/11
- Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/12
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Payas Relekar, 2022/12/08