Re: Detecting tree-sitter based major-modes for end-user customization and third party functions/packages

[Jostein Kjønigsen]

On 20.12.2022 16:38, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Looking at (treesit-major-mode-setup), I can't see it leaving any traces to
> > be reliably detected later. Should we add some (documented) buffer-local
> > variables to be able to detect this later? Should we create a mostly empty
> > minor-mode for easy detection and ability to add hooks?
> (treesit-parser-list) seems like a good first approximation, tho I guess
> it depends exactly what they want to do with that info.
>
>
>          Stefan
That name isn't very intuitive for what it does, but it seems to work. I 
therefore kinda of second Theo's suggestion in the other thread 
mentioned by Eli about possibly trying to come up with a nicer/more 
obvious syntax for it.

Either way, thanks for a quick and accurate answer!

--
Jostein