[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: describe-char-fold-equivalences
From: |
T.V Raman |
Subject: |
Re: describe-char-fold-equivalences |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jan 2023 06:57:53 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Yuri Khan <yuri.v.khan@gmail.com> writes:
It did make it obvious, the me the user still got confused -- I wasn't
aware of that particular usage
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 11:27, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Calling describe-char-fold-equivalences and specifying "'"
>> displays the following --- could we get rid of the '\n' that
>> appears on every line as a field delimiter?
>
> Those are not newlines (backslash small letter en) but syntax for
> specifying a character by its Unicode name (question mark backslash
> capital en). Maybe your screen reader does not make that obvious.
>
>> ': ?\N{APOSTROPHE}
--
Thanks,
--Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
?7?4 Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 ?0?8
- describe-char-fold-equivalences, T.V Raman, 2023/01/07
- Re: describe-char-fold-equivalences, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/08
- Re: describe-char-fold-equivalences, Yuri Khan, 2023/01/08
- Re: describe-char-fold-equivalences,
T.V Raman <=
- Re: describe-char-fold-equivalences, Robert Pluim, 2023/01/09
- Re: describe-char-fold-equivalences, T.V Raman, 2023/01/09
- Re: describe-char-fold-equivalences, Robert Pluim, 2023/01/09
- Re: describe-char-fold-equivalences, T.V Raman, 2023/01/09
- Re: describe-char-fold-equivalences, Robert Pluim, 2023/01/10