[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Partly deferred font-locking?
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: Partly deferred font-locking? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2023 15:38:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> It's a trade-off: you assume that users don't want to see the
> fontifications change in near real-time when editing long lines, but
> that is just an assumption, not necessarily true.
Yes, it really depends on the use case.
My cases so far were all of the category: "expensive" fontification
still happens nearly instantly, hardly noticeable for the human eye, but
slow enough to make scrolling feeling a bit sluggish.
Michael.
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, (continued)
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/12
- Re: Partly deferred font-locking?, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/01/12