[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: tree-sitter: conceptional problem solvable at Emacs' level?

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: tree-sitter: conceptional problem solvable at Emacs' level?
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:48:29 +0200

> From: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 11:31:39 +0000
> > And I'm sure there are other alternatives.  This issue is not unique
> > to Emacs, so studying how other IDEs deal with it could also yield
> > ideas.
> I'm aware of three FOSS IDEs that are somewhat linked to C++ and/or Qt:
> * KDevelop (from the KDE pro project)
> * Kate (dito, although some might not call it an IDE)
> * Qt Creator
> For the first two I have no info if they even looked into Tree-Sitter.
> However, Qt Creator does't want to implement Tree-Sitter at all, they
> are happy with KSyntaxHighlighting. See
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-26348
> KSyntaxHighligting is in turn from the KDE project, and used in KDevelop
> and Kate. So basically all three use the same technology. Which seems to
> work nicely for them.


However, I meant the IDEs which are using tree-sitter and support
developing C/C++ programs.  I believe some do.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]