[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: file-equal-p
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: file-equal-p |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:42:49 +0200 |
> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:34:04 +0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > It is still one more test, done for everyone.
>
> Is file-equal-p a function called in particularly tight loops?
I don't know, but punishing everyone for the benefit of a single OS
sounds wrong to me.
> It will otherwise result in file-attributes being called two more times
> on the system being tested against.
Not if you call file-attributes once and store the results in local
variables.
- file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/15
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/17
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/17
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/17
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/17
- Re: file-equal-p, Andreas Schwab, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Michael Albinus, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16