[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging feature/android
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Merging feature/android |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Mar 2023 16:35:47 +0200 |
> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu
> Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 21:28:27 +0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > So why shouldn't it be the same with modules? Don't we want the user
> > to be aware that modules support will be absent?
>
> No, I don't think so: that would amount to making Emacs not build
> by default without a recent GCC.
We had this in emacs-module.c for a long time, including two major
releases. How come it was never a problem until now?
- Re: Merging feature/android, (continued)
- Re: Merging feature/android, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/02
- Re: Merging feature/android, Po Lu, 2023/03/02
- Re: Merging feature/android, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/02
- Re: Merging feature/android, Po Lu, 2023/03/02
- Re: Merging feature/android, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/03
- Re: Merging feature/android, Po Lu, 2023/03/03
- Re: Merging feature/android, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/03
- Re: Merging feature/android, Po Lu, 2023/03/03
- Re: Merging feature/android, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/03
- Re: Merging feature/android, Po Lu, 2023/03/03
- Re: Merging feature/android,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Merging feature/android, Po Lu, 2023/03/03
- Re: Merging feature/android, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/04
- Re: Merging feature/android, Po Lu, 2023/03/04
- Re: Merging feature/android, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/04
- Re: Merging feature/android, Po Lu, 2023/03/04
- Re: Merging feature/android, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/04
- Re: Merging feature/android, Po Lu, 2023/03/04
- Re: Merging feature/android, Paul Eggert, 2023/03/04
- Re: Merging feature/android, Po Lu, 2023/03/04
- Re: Merging feature/android, Paul Eggert, 2023/03/05