[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :cor
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages? |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Mar 2023 15:20:30 +0200 |
> From: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 03:18:55 -0800
>
> On Mar, 2023-03-05 14:17, Yuan Fu wrote ...
> > - c-ts-mode.el
>
> I understand what :core actually means.
>
> But I think we don't need to battle test c-ts-mode.el. We already know
> that it leaves to be desired --- in cases where C or C++ macros are
> used.
>
> For my programs, I got worse font-locking and indentation than with the
> the non-TS modes.
That is one important reason why these packages are completely
optional: if you don't like the results, simply don't use them until
they become better.
- Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/05
- Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?, Holger Schurig, 2023/03/07
- Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/07
- Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/03/07