|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: Merging feature/android |
Date: | Tue, 7 Mar 2023 23:07:01 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 |
On 2023-03-07 22:58, Po Lu wrote:
We're not talking about image libraries here, but something extremely basic, be it window system support (libXpm) or a C compiler.
I don't know what heuristic was used to decide that GnuTLS and some image libraries are considered important enough to nag the Emacs builder about, whereas libraries like libXpm are considered less important. Perhaps Eli or Stefan can comment on what the heuristic is.
Anyway, since this support is going to be made `ifavailable' by default for Android, what makes other systems which don't use GCC any different? On newer versions of Android, modules don't work anyway because security policy prohibits calling dlopen or exec on files in application writable directories, but that is besides the point.
I agree with the suggestion of making modules ifavailable by default on all platforms, as this is more consistent, and it better reflects the fact that anyway Emacs must work without any modules installed.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |