[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unboxed package manager

From: Philip Kaludercic
Subject: Re: Unboxed package manager
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:06:27 +0000

Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 19:10, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>> Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 15:25, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>> There is no strict need for this to be a package manager.  I propose
>> something like that a year ago:
>>   https://wwwcip.cs.fau.de/~oj14ozun/src+etc/site-lisp.el
>> In principle I could bundle this into a package and add it to ELPA.
> Yes, I remember that.  And if memory serves someone argued that this
> could be greatly generalized and etc., which is probably true.

It was "generalised" into package-vc.

> Anyway, I think it makes sense for basic things one needs to write a
> sensible configuration to be built in, but if there's no consensus as to
> how the ideal "site-lisp.el" should look like, then a package is better
> than nothing.

OK, I'll try and prepare it then.

Philip Kaludercic

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]