[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: treesit indentation "blinking"

From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: Re: treesit indentation "blinking"
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:36:25 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0

On 30/03/2023 12:28, João Távora wrote:
This problematic already counts as "bouncing" to me, for some meaning of
"bouncing". c++-mode doesn't behave like that because indentation is
already where it is supposed to be if you type that sequence of

Okay, if that's what you meant.

I think this one (indentation after RET in an incomplete function definition) should be fixed in the indentation rules. The contents of electric-indent-chars won't fix it either way.

And did you try the final example that I showed in the animated gif?
That's even more "bouncy", at least in my book.

Yep, I see that. Also seems like something that could be improved in the indentation rules. When there is just one or no semis inside for's parens, we get ERROR nodes. I guess some rule is hit that should not be hit.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]