[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Apr 2023 09:42:53 +0200 |
1 apr. 2023 kl. 08.39 skrev Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
> I don't want to make changes on the release branch without a positive
> evidence that the existing code causes verifiable problems. And even
> then I prefer to make changes only for platforms where those problems
> happen.
I'm not overly worried about the code, but to put this matter to rest, what
about simply dropping the vectorisation altogether, on all platforms, in Emacs
29? That should be very safe.
drop-string-lessp-vectorisation.diff
Description: Binary data
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Po Lu, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Po Lu, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Arsen Arsenović, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Arsen Arsenović, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Po Lu, 2023/04/01
- Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, Po Lu, 2023/04/01