[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master 6ebce84ff2b: Use t for non-nil default values in boolean defc
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
Re: master 6ebce84ff2b: Use t for non-nil default values in boolean defcustom declarations |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Apr 2023 13:07:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Mattias EngdegÄrd <mattiase@acm.org> writes:
Hi Mattias,
>> I'm just curious. Is there an advantage in using the (not (not ...))
>> pattern? I would use (and ... t) instead, but perhaps your pattern is
>> more performant? Or is it just a personal style?
>
> I have no particular preference for either. If (and X t) is generally better
> liked, then it's fine to change to that.
Thanks for the reply. No, I don't believe it is needed to change your
personal style :-)
Best regards, Michael.