[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496) |
Date: |
Fri, 05 May 2023 14:17:54 +0300 |
> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 19:00:48 +0800
>
> Anyway, I don't object to explaining what we call ``minimized'', as long
> as it is confined to some short introductory text in the manual. But we
> should never use the term ``minimized'' ourselves.
That's not the current policy, and I see no reason to enforce such
restrictions. So please stop pushing others to adopt your personal
preferences.
> > Today, a lot of free software desktop environments, window systems,
> > window managers etc are available. Some may present invisible windows
> > as icons, others as buttons in window lists, a thumbnail in a dock, or
>
> A thumbnail, or a button containing an icon, is not/does not contain an
> icon?
They are not necessarily icons or buttons nowadays. Some desktops
actually display a miniature snapshot of the frame.
Anyway, this argument leads nowhere, so I wish we'd stop wasting each
other's time.
- Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496), (continued)
- Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496), Óscar Fuentes, 2023/05/05
- Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496), tomas, 2023/05/05
- Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/05
- Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496), tomas, 2023/05/05
- Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/05
- Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496), Po Lu, 2023/05/05
- Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/05
Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496), Tobias Bading, 2023/05/05