Re: [ELPA] New package: pdf-view-pagemark

[Philip Kaludercic]

Jijun Ma <jijun.ma@hotmail.com> writes:

> Thanks!
> Now I've signed the FSF CA.

While this is being proceed, I'd like question why you think that this
your package is better distributed separately?  Taking a look at the
code, modulo user options, helper functions and other decoration the
main functionality boils down to a single function.  Is it really worth
the maintainer-overhead to distribute this separately?  Have you
communicated with the upstream developers on the matter?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:25 PM
> To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Cc: jijun.ma@hotmail.com; emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: pdf-view-pagemark
>
>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
>> Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>, "'Eli Zaretskii'"
>>  <eliz@gnu.org>
>> Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 06:42:49 +0000
>> 
>> Jijun Ma <jijun.ma@hotmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> > That's a feature not strongly part of pdf-tools, better to be an extension.
>> > I've not signed FSF CA yet. How can I sign?
>> 
>> I don't have a copy of the form, Eli can send them to you.
>
> Form sent off-list.