Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil

[Philip Kaludercic]

Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com> writes:

> On 5/10/2023 11:33 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Please reconsider, I think this name is very unfortunate, because it
>> gives users no clue whatsoever about the package's purpose.
>
> How about something like "devil-keys"? That should make it clear that
> the package has something to do with keys. It doesn't tell exactly
> what it *does* with those keys, but I think a more-detailed
> description belongs in the package description or the manual.
>
> Within the package itself, I think it would be fine to refer to it as
> "Devil" (without the "-keys"), since once you're looking at the
> package in detail, the "keys" hint isn't needed anymore.

I think this is a nice idea, and a good compromise.