[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] New package: dict
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] New package: dict |
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2023 19:38:59 +0000 |
Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com> writes:
> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com> writes:
>>
>>> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> + (dict :url "git://git.eshelyaron.com/dict.git"
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any other access method beside git://?
>>>
>>> For anonymous access, currently no. But I can mirror the repo to
>>> Sourcehut from where you can clone it via HTTPS. Would that be more
>>> convenient?
>>
>> That would be good, my understanding is that git:// is not encrypted so
>> we should avoid using it if possible.
>
>>>>> + :doc "README.org")
>>>>
>>>> Should we add a ":readme ignore" to prevent the contents of this file
>>>> from also appearing when the user invokes C-h P dict RET ?
>>>
>>> Sure, in this case would C-h P show the commentary section of dict.el?
>>
>> Right. Feel free to extend that with pointers, I just think we should
>> avoid overwhelming users with the entire documentation if they just want
>> to get the basic gist of a package.
>
> Alright, I'm attaching a new patch that addresses both these points.
>
> From 2466225fd527e3748c266307d6858407011105f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 14:20:16 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH v2] * elpa-packages (dict): New package
>
> ---
> elpa-packages | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/elpa-packages b/elpa-packages
> index d5603f7803..637d71685e 100644
> --- a/elpa-packages
> +++ b/elpa-packages
> @@ -201,6 +201,9 @@
> :news "CHANGELOG.org"
> :readme "README.md")
> (devdocs :url "https://github.com/astoff/devdocs.el")
> + (dict :url "https://git.sr.ht/~eshel/dict"
> + :doc "README.org"
> + :readme ignore)
> (dict-tree :url "http://www.dr-qubit.org/git/predictive.git"
> :manual-sync t ;; The upstream doesn't exist any more!
> )
> --
> 2.40.1
So what is the resolution here. Are we to add this as an additional
package to GNU ELPA, or is the intention to merge dictionary and dict?
Re: [ELPA] New package: dict, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/05/11
Re: [ELPA] New package: dict, Richard Stallman, 2023/05/13
Re: [ELPA] New package: dict, Eshel Yaron, 2023/05/14