Re: [PROPOSAL] Builder, a build system integration for Emacs

[tomas]

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 06:53:56AM +0000, Gregory Heytings wrote:

[...]

> > The new models just make it slightly more inconvenient to stay free.
> > 
> 
> You are spreading FUD [...]

Convenience, as FUD is in the eye of the beholder. We know what
we are talking about, so let everyone decide for herself.

[...]

> > Can we call this pattern neo-proprietary?
> > 
> 
> No, we cannot.  There is no relation whatsoever between software
> proprietariness and this elegant solution to the problem of library
> dependencies.

Agani, let's agree to differ here. I know my position here might
be controversial and I don't expect anyone to agree with me.

With all due respect.

Cheers
-- 
t

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature