[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom)
From: |
Daniel Semyonov |
Subject: |
Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom) |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:02:34 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
>>>>> Thomas Fitzsimmons writes:
> For comparison, the convenience function,
> gnus-group-make-rss-group, asks for the blog title, with a
> reasonable default suggestion, and the resulting line in *Group*
> for my blog is:
> nnrss:fitzsim's development log
> With the procedure you suggested, I end up with:
> nnatom+www.fitzsim.org/blog/?feed=atom:fitzsim's development log
> FWIW, I prefer the former. I think the +.. part is necessary for
> stuff like email where the field after the ":" is frequently the
> same (e.g., nnimap+mail.host1:INBOX, nnimap+mail.host2:INBOX)
> whereas blog titles are usually unique, so the host/url designator
> becomes redundant.
The procedure I suggested is pretty much the standard way to subscribe
to groups through Gnus.
Also, the '+...' part is necessary, nnrss doesn't need it for the same
reason it requires a special function to add groups. If it really
bothers you customize the group line format.
> Have you considered defining a `gnus-group-make-atom-group'
> convenience function in nnatom.el (even though that's sort of a
> namespace violation), and install a hook that binds that function
> to a key in the *Group* buffer ("G A" seems to be available).
As I said before I have considered it, but not before fixing remaining
issues. Honestly even then I don't really see why its so much more
convenient, other than it being familiar.
If you compare the two methods directly (G R <url> RET RET vs
B <url> RET u) they're very similar really.
- Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom), Daniel Semyonov, 2023/05/31
- Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom), Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2023/05/31
- Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom), Daniel Semyonov, 2023/05/31
- Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom), Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2023/05/31
- Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom), Daniel Semyonov, 2023/05/31
- Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom), Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2023/05/31
- Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom), Daniel Semyonov, 2023/05/31
- Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom), Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2023/05/31
- Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom),
Daniel Semyonov <=
- Re: Atom backend for Gnus (nnatom), Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2023/05/31