Re: question regarding my emacs package

[Philip Kaludercic]

ram via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org> writes:

> thanks. did not know this existed. from a quick glance, it looks like
> there’s no crossover in prefixes? that seems ok

Yes, but it is pretty close and will probably cause confusion.  That
being said, João is not part of any ELPA so one could argue the name
hasn't been reserved...

> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 2:49 PM, João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Just a FYI, I've recently (about a month ago) created a package called 
> breadcrumb.el, singular. Lives at
>  https://github.com/joaotavora/breadcrumb and seems to be fairly popular.
>
>  Not saying anyone should consider changing package names, just dropping this 
> note here as a FYI.
>
>  João
>
>  On Wed, Jun 7, 2023, 13:09 ram <chat@rj95.be> wrote:
>
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA512
>
>  hi, i am a professional programmer, but this is my first time submitting an 
> emacs package. i have
>  conversed a little with stefan monnier, and i believe the package i have 
> meets the requirements for
>  elpa submission, but i am unsure as to the appropriate licensure. i took 
> some inspiration from two
>  packages: dogears and gumshoe, neither of which is in elpa. however, i did 
> not use any code from
>  here; i just wanted some inspiration regarding the feature set
>
>  it is unclear to me whether my package warrants inclusion in gnu or non gnu 
> elpa, if at all, but i
>  have certainly found it useful, despite its simplicity
>
>  here is the repo: https://github.com/gitrj95/breadcrumbs.el
>
>  best,
>  ram
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>  Version: ProtonMail
>
>  wnUEARYKACcFgmR/9tMJkLWF/Pp8PQPNFiEExUjWugOWGzBgCQZvtYX8+nw9
>  A80AACtMAQDBJcq/+hW8lFC/JkXKSAsIjD5/dFF/jcjYjfRh3o0TMwD9Eb4W
>  f0DKtY6/QCgyoPMLsMIBUf1cDZ1c53rQ9xHWCAI=
>  =5pUI
>  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

-- 
Philip Kaludercic