[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Aug 2023 07:23:30 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 22:48:42 +0300
> Cc: danny@dfreeman.email, stefankangas@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net,
> emacs-devel@gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
>
> On 26/08/2023 22:32, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 22:09:47 +0300
> >> Cc:danny@dfreeman.email,stefankangas@gmail.com,philipk@posteo.net,
> >> emacs-devel@gnu.org,manuel.uberti@inventati.org
> >> From: Dmitry Gutov<dmitry@gutov.dev>
> >>
> >> On 26/08/2023 22:05, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >>>> Or the longevity stems from other reasons (e.g. good fundamental ideas,
> >>>> unique proposition, being part of the original GNU system, ...), and the
> >>>> development process is the reason the current user base is a fraction of
> >>>> even Vim's (not to mention popular commercial offerings).
> >>>>
> >>>> Just an alternative POV to consider. In truth, could be a little of both.
> >>> Mine wasn't a POV, it was an observation based on many years of
> >>> watching the development and being part of it.
> >> Are you talking about Emacs as a whole, or sub-packages inside it?
> > The former, of course.
>
> Then I don't see what your baseline is.
The state of Emacs, its features (both editing and display), its
continued development, and the quality of its code and documentation.
> I used Vim as an example (30 years old project, more popular these days,
> in part thanks to NeoVim).
Does Vim or NeoVim support bidirectional editing?
- Re: Clojure mode, (continued)
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Stefan Kangas, 2023/08/24
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Danny Freeman, 2023/08/24
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/25
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/08/26
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/26
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/08/26
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/26
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/08/26
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Po Lu, 2023/08/27
- Message not available
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/27
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/08/26
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/08/26
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/27
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/08/27
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/27
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Stefan Kangas, 2023/08/27
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/27
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Po Lu, 2023/08/27