[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Aug 2023 07:32:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> You can again compare Elisp with CL and let us know what is
> being noticeably slower. It will be an indication that
> something might be improved.
Here is a new file:
https://dataswamp.org/~incal/cl/bench/flet.cl
The CL time is 0.84 vs Elisp time at 1.35.
So here, CL is 61% faster!
(format "%d%%" (round (* 100 (1- (/ 1.35 0.84)))))
flet
0.839996 s real time
0.839262 s run time
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, tomas, 2023/08/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, Gerd Möllmann, 2023/08/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, Gerd Möllmann, 2023/08/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, Po Lu, 2023/08/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, Gerd Möllmann, 2023/08/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, Simon Leinen, 2023/08/18
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/19
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/20
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/20
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Bignum performance,
Emanuel Berg <=