[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shrinking the C core
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Shrinking the C core |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:20:33 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Arthur Miller <arthur.miller@live.com> writes:
> By the way, a single threaded shared state does not thread itself just
> because it is transplanted over a multithreaded implementation :). Of
> course. But getting access to such platform enables people to use
> threads, while the implementation itself is tranformed, as well as buys
> other benefits as discussed above.
I'll reiterate this again: facilitating the execution of Lisp threads in
parallel -- a more or less complete job -- is 5% of the work required
for a concurrent Emacs.
The tedious, insipid task of interlocking all that ``single threaded
shared state'' follows and constitutes the bulk of that work, which
someone must sign up for irrespective of the language it is written in.
- Re: Shrinking the C core, (continued)
Re: Shrinking the C core, Arthur Miller, 2023/08/27
Re: Shrinking the C core, Richard Stallman, 2023/08/27
Re: Shrinking the C core, Po Lu, 2023/08/27
- Re: Shrinking the C core, chad, 2023/08/27
- Re: Shrinking the C core, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/28
- Re: Shrinking the C core, Arthur Miller, 2023/08/28
- Re: Shrinking the C core, Po Lu, 2023/08/28
- Re: Shrinking the C core, Andrea Monaco, 2023/08/28
- Re: Shrinking the C core, Arthur Miller, 2023/08/28